We consider how incorporating gender considerations and various feminisms in evaluation work can inform all the steps in the project cycle going forward
Gender and Feminist Lens(es) in Evaluation FINAL.pptx
The pilot year process evaluation will inform modifications to the next pro-bono project cycle, with hopes of institutionalizing the program within AaEA
Pro Bono AEA Presentation 10-26-16_final3.pdf
The session reviews both how we need to fill a gap in the project cycle (currently missing post-project evaluation of sustainability) but also how sustainability can be designed in, monitored and evaluated throughout the cycle
Papers and presentations from the session: Systems Perspectives on Using Logic Models to Improve Evaluation Quality Panel Session 663 #SystemsinEvaluation #model #2010Conference #logframe #Systems #program #TheoriesofEvaluation #Logic
4 attachments
See matching library entry files - * Variations to Logical Framework: Proje...
In the real world logic of programs under evaluation is not always clear and consistent. According to my experience, three most common flaws in program logic are: (1) use of indicators instead of goals and objectives (the goals are “too SMART”), (2) lack of program/project goals, and (3) lack of...
Reconstruction of Program Logic Kuzmin for upload.pptx
Performance measurement and reporting systems (PMRS) housed in web-based management information systems are widely used in the public sector to improve accountability and inform decision making. Periodic evaluation of these systems ensures effective performance measurement. This panel...
AEA_PerfMeasCDC_10272012_1.pptx
Case study of the strategies that led to the strengthening of Design, Monitoring and Evaluation in CARE during 12 years Jim Rugh headed that work, plus brief annexes from CRS, Save and American Red Cross. #evaluation #in #2009Conference #Session #Evaluation2009 #847 ...
2 attachments
Have you had the experience of being asked to perform an evaluation of a project that was almost finished, there was no baseline, and there can’t be a comparison group, yet your clients expected “rigorous impact evaluation”? Not only that, but as you were negotiating the terms of reference you...
aea10.Rugh.1.21.pdf
PowerPoint presentation plus condensed overview of the new RealWorld Evaluation book (to be published by Sage in December). In graduate school, you might have learned how to do research using randomized control trials. Then you were asked to design an evaluation of a “real” program. But, what if...
Session Description: What do you do when asked to perform an evaluation on a program that is well underway? When your questions about baseline data and control groups are met with blank stares? When time and resources are few, yet clients expect “rigorous impact evaluation”? When there are...